Field Methods
The field portion of HBI monitoring begins with
site decisions, usually establishing control and potentially-impacted
locations. Sampling is recommended prior to 1 June or after 1 September
of the year. Three replicate samples comprise
a complete collection. For the City of River Falls North
Kinnickinnic River Monitoring Project three sample sites were utilized
for HBI sampling. These included, by name: 1) North Main Site, 2)
Swinging Gate (STH 65), and Hebert (originally Hebert-Hagen) Site.
The following field protocol, derived from
Hilsenhoff 1987, was followed:
Equipment:
D-net, labels, 8 oz jar, permanent marker, 95% ethanol, metric stick,
thermometer
Protocol:
1a. Use an aquatic net to
sample a site where the current is greater than 0.30 m/sec (1.0 ft/sec)
and the substrate is composed of gravel, pebbles, and (or) small rocks.
This should preferably be a riffle area where the substrate causes a
disturbance of the water's surface. (All riffle areas with a depth of
at least 10 cm will have a current of at least 0.30 m/sec.) In
sand-bottomed streams, sample debris collected on snags in fast
current.
1b. Collection of
arthropods is best accomplished by placing the net against the stream
bottom and disturbing the substrate immediately upsteam from the net
with your feet. In very fast currents avoid having the net so close to
your feet that gravel and pebbles are washed into it. Avoid collecting
from rooted macrophytes and filamentous algae.
2. Collect until there
is enough debris in the net to fill an 8-ounce (237 ml) jar, or until it
is obvious that more than 100 arthropods have been captured. Remove
sticks and large undecomposed leaves from the rest of debris, washing
arthropods from them by rinsing in the net in a pool area.
3. Place the arthropods
along with all debris in a labeled jar and add enough 95% ethanol to
produce a concentration of about 70% when mixed with the water in the
debris.
3a. Include all arthropods clinging to the net that are 3 mm long and
all adult Elmidae.
Field samples for both 2004 and 2005 were carried
out by C. Garry and K. Johnson.
Laboratory Methods
The following lab protocol, derived from Hilsenhoff
1987, was followed:
Equipment:
grided sorting tray, storage jars, vials/caps, random number set,
forceps, labeling materials, 70% EtOH, illuminated magnifier
Protocol:
1. After returning to
the laboratory, sample jars completely filled with debris should be
drained of ethanol by pouring through a screen or net with a 1.0 mm or
smaller mesh. The ethanol should then be replaced with 70% ethanol. An
alternative is to refrigerate the sample to allow ample time for
diffusion of the ethanol throughout the debris and into the arthropods.
2. About 15 minutes
before picking and sorting a sample in the laboratory, strain the
ethanol from the sample and replace it with water. No arthropods should
remain floating on the surface of the water.
3a. Place the contents of
the jar in a large, flat pan marked with a grid, add two or three
additional jars full of water, and spread the contents evenly over the
bottom of the pan.
If the jar is
completely filled with fine debris, especially filamentous algae, only
half of the sample should be initially placed in the pan for sorting,
with care being taken to assure that each half of the sample contains
the same amount and kinds of debris.
A 30 by 45-cm pan
with a 5-cm grid is satisfactory. Select a starting square for each
sample by picking a number from a box of corresponding numbers or from a
table of random numbers.
3b. Remove all arthropods
from the starting square and then remove arthropods from each
successively higher numbered square. An arthropod on a line is
considered to be in the square that contains its head, or in the square
closest to its head. After the highest numbered square has been
sampled, return to square 1. Remove and preserve at least 100
arthropods. Remove all arthropods from the last square to be picked.
Not collected:
Hemiptera,
Coleoptera other than Dryopoidea (Dryopidae, Elmidae),
arthropods less than 3 mm long (because most cannot be identified) . . .
except for adult Elmidae and fifth instar Hydroptilidae larvae (which
have expanded abdomens and are usually in cases)
An illuminated 5X
magnifier on a long, movable arm (LuxoŽ) will facilitate finding and
removing arthropods from the pan.
4. Preserve all
arthropods in 70% ethanol for identification to genus or species.
Isopropyl alcohol may also be used.
5. Sort and identify all
arthropods to genus, except Chironomidae, which should be placed in a
separate vial. When all samples have been identified to genus, species
identification should be made whenever necessary and possible. This is
best accomplished by working on one genus at a time and identifying
species in that genus from all samples before identifying species in
another genus.
Chironomidae are
sorted to genus by placing those that look alike together. Head color,
head size and shape, markings on the head, antennal length and
structure, number and location of eye spots, general shape and
pigmentation of the mentum, length and color of preanal papillae and
setae, length of prolegs and color of their claws, and general
coloration are among the characters that can be used to separate
genera. Mount the two most dissimilar larvae from each group in Hoyer's
medium under separate cover slips on the same slide. If both are found
to be the same genus, the remainder may be assumed to be also the same
and need not be mounted. If they are different, further sorting and
slide mounting is needed or all must be mounted on slides. An
alternative is to clear all larvae in 10% KOH and make temporary mounts
in glycerine for identification.
6. Record the number of
each species on a data sheet and multiply the number by the tolerance
value for that species. Sum the products and divide by the total number
of arthropods in the sample to obtain the biotic index for the stream.
Table 1 is a general guide to the water quality of streams. Replicate
samples, or both spring and fall samples, will add to the confidence of
the evaluation.
Lab processing through step 4 above was carried out
in 2004 by C. Garry; the same steps in 2005 were carried out by UW-River
Falls graduate student Z. McCallister. Identification of specimens and
HBI determinations were carried out by J. Dimick, Aquatic Entomology
Laboratory, UW-Stevens Point.